Mapping Entry

Philippines Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act

The Philippines DRRM Act institutionalises disaster governance across national and local levels, but displacement continuity depends on whether local systems can carry assistance beyond evacuation and emergency response.

Political economy archetype Decentralized responsibility with local fiscal exposure

Disaster governance is institutionalized nationally but depends heavily on local governments whose fiscal and administrative capacity determines continuity.

What it is

Republic Act No. 10121 is the Philippines' Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act. It strengthens the national disaster risk reduction and management system, establishes the national framework, and organizes responsibilities across national agencies, local governments, and disaster risk reduction councils.

Governance function

The Act decentralizes and institutionalizes disaster risk management. It connects preparedness, prevention, response, rehabilitation, and recovery to local government structures, making local capacity central to displacement outcomes.

Who is included

Communities and households affected by disasters, including those evacuated or internally displaced by hazards, may be included through national and local DRRM mechanisms.

Who is left out

Displaced households may fall out when they move across local government jurisdictions, remain displaced beyond emergency cycles, lack documentation, or cannot access local recovery programmes.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks between evacuation assistance and longer-term housing, livelihood, social protection, education, health, and local development planning.

Why it matters

The Philippines has one of the region's most developed disaster governance frameworks, but disaster displacement still exposes local fiscal and administrative capacity constraints. The political economy archetype is decentralized disaster governance with local fiscal exposure.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeDecentralized responsibility with local fiscal exposure
ResponsibilityThe National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council, Office of Civil Defense, line agencies, local DRRM councils, and local government units carry major responsibilities.
EligibilityEligibility depends on disaster impact, local assessment, evacuation or affected-person status, and programme-specific criteria.
FinancingFinancing comes through national and local DRRM funds, local government budgets, recovery allocations, and external support where available.
Data systemsDisaster assessments, evacuation records, local registries, damage and needs assessments, social welfare lists, and sectoral databases shape implementation.
Delivery systemDelivery runs through local governments, DRRM councils, emergency response systems, social welfare offices, schools, health facilities, and national agencies.
PortabilityPortability is constrained when assistance is tied to the locality of origin or evacuation site and records do not transfer easily across jurisdictions.
AccountabilityAccountability depends on statutory duties, local government oversight, audit, council structures, grievance mechanisms, and political accountability.
Time horizonPrevention, preparedness, response, rehabilitation, and recovery, with displacement often continuing beyond formal response periods.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

No sources listed yet.

Related Mapping entries

Related research