Mapping Entry

World Bank IDA Window for Host Communities and Refugees

The IDA Window for Host Communities and Refugees helps turn refugee hosting into a development-finance issue, but inclusion depends on host-state policy, project design, and whether financing strengthens ordinary systems.

Political economy archetype Conditional fiscal absorption

Refugee-hosting costs are partially absorbed into development finance where host-state policy commitments and concessional financing align.

What it is

The World Bank IDA Window for Host Communities and Refugees provides dedicated concessional financing to eligible low-income countries hosting significant refugee populations. It supports medium- to long-term development opportunities for refugees and host communities.

Governance function

The window shifts part of refugee response from humanitarian appeals into development finance. It supports investments in services, livelihoods, institutions, infrastructure, and policy environments that benefit both refugees and host communities.

Who is included

Refugees and host communities in eligible IDA countries may benefit through projects that support services, livelihoods, local development, institutional capacity, or policy reforms.

Who is left out

Refugees in countries outside eligibility criteria, urban refugees not captured in project areas, undocumented populations, IDPs, and non-refugee displaced groups may fall outside unless project design includes them through other channels.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks when refugee inclusion is project-based, when host-state policies restrict access to work or services, when local institutions are underfinanced after project closure, or when national systems do not absorb recurrent costs.

Why it matters

The window is central to fiscal architecture because it recognizes that host countries incur development costs when hosting refugees. The political economy archetype is conditional fiscal absorption: development finance can make inclusion more feasible, but only where host-state policy and project systems align.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeConditional fiscal absorption
ResponsibilityHost governments, World Bank teams, IDA governance structures, implementing agencies, local authorities, and partner institutions share responsibility through project preparation and implementation.
EligibilityEligibility depends on country access to IDA, refugee-hosting context, policy commitments, project criteria, and World Bank operational requirements.
FinancingFinancing is concessional IDA financing dedicated to refugee-hosting contexts, usually through country operations and project-specific allocations.
Data systemsRefugee registration, national statistics, project beneficiary data, service delivery records, local government data, and monitoring frameworks shape implementation.
Delivery systemDelivery runs through national ministries, local governments, development projects, service providers, livelihood programmes, and infrastructure investments.
PortabilityPortability depends on whether project benefits connect refugees to national systems, documentation, labour markets, social protection, and services beyond project areas.
AccountabilityAccountability includes World Bank project supervision, government implementation responsibilities, grievance mechanisms, results frameworks, and donor/shareholder oversight.
Time horizonMedium- to long-term development financing, though project cycles may still be shorter than displacement duration.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

No sources listed yet.

Related Mapping entries

Related research