Mapping Entry

World Bank Adaptive Social Protection Framework

Adaptive social protection strengthens systems for shocks, but displacement inclusion depends on whether registries, financing, and delivery rules can follow people across place and status.

Political economy archetype Shock-responsive expansion with registry dependency

Social protection can scale during shocks, but displaced people benefit only if registries, financing, triggers, and payment systems can reach them.

What it is

The World Bank adaptive social protection framework focuses on building social protection systems that can help poor and vulnerable households prepare for, cope with, and adapt to shocks. It emphasizes programmes, data and information, finance, institutions, and partnerships.

Governance function

The framework links social protection to resilience, disaster risk management, climate adaptation, and crisis response. For displacement governance, its function is to show how ordinary systems can scale, adjust, and respond before humanitarian need becomes entrenched.

Who is included

Poor and vulnerable households covered by social protection systems may be included, especially where registries, payment systems, contingency finance, and shock-response protocols exist.

Who is left out

Displaced households, refugees, informal migrants, undocumented people, and people outside registry systems may remain excluded unless adaptive systems are explicitly designed to include them.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks when shock response expands vertically or horizontally for registered households but does not capture displaced people who have moved, lost documents, crossed borders, or fallen outside standard poverty targeting.

Why it matters

Adaptive social protection is essential for the displacement continuum because it addresses shocks before, during, and after crisis. The political economy archetype is shock-responsive expansion with registry dependency: systems can scale, but only for people they can see and finance.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeShock-responsive expansion with registry dependency
ResponsibilitySocial protection ministries, finance ministries, disaster management agencies, local governments, development partners, and payment or data providers share implementation responsibilities.
EligibilityEligibility depends on programme rules, poverty or vulnerability criteria, registry inclusion, shock triggers, geographic targeting, and contingency protocols.
FinancingFinancing may include regular social protection budgets, contingency funds, disaster risk finance, donor support, emergency reallocations, and pre-arranged finance.
Data systemsSocial registries, beneficiary databases, early warning systems, disaster risk data, payment systems, civil registration, and household surveys are central.
Delivery systemDelivery runs through cash transfers, public works, social assistance, social insurance links, payment systems, local administrators, and grievance mechanisms.
PortabilityPortability depends on whether benefits and records move with people across districts, borders, displacement sites, and administrative categories.
AccountabilityAccountability depends on programme grievance systems, transparency of targeting, shock-response protocols, audit, and monitoring of inclusion outcomes.
Time horizonPreparedness, anticipatory action, emergency scale-up, recovery, and long-term resilience.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

Related Mapping entries

Related research