Mapping Entry

Platform on Disaster Displacement and Nansen Protection Agenda

The Nansen Protection Agenda and Platform on Disaster Displacement address cross-border disaster displacement, but protection depends on states using migration, humanitarian, and protection tools without a dedicated binding status.

Political economy archetype Tool-based protection without binding status

States can use migration, humanitarian, disaster, and protection tools for cross-border disaster displacement, but no binding status category is created.

What it is

The Nansen Initiative produced the Protection Agenda for people displaced across borders in the context of disasters and climate change. The Platform on Disaster Displacement was created to follow up and support implementation of that agenda.

Governance function

The agenda and platform identify practices and policy tools for admission, stay, planned relocation, disaster risk reduction, migration pathways, and protection cooperation in disaster displacement contexts.

Who is included

People displaced across borders by sudden-onset disasters, slow-onset processes, and climate-related hazards may be addressed through the agenda, as may people at risk of displacement.

Who is left out

People may remain outside if states do not use discretionary admission, humanitarian visas, temporary protection, migration pathways, or other mechanisms. Internally displaced disaster-affected populations are addressed mainly through other frameworks.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks when admission is temporary, when protection tools are discretionary, when return is unsafe, or when people move from disaster response into irregular migration status.

Why it matters

This entry captures one of the main gaps in the displacement continuum: people displaced across borders by disasters often do not fit refugee law but still require protection. The political economy archetype is tool-based protection without a binding status category.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeTool-based protection without binding status
ResponsibilityStates remain central, supported by the Platform on Disaster Displacement, IOM, UNHCR, regional organizations, disaster risk actors, migration authorities, and civil society.
EligibilityEligibility depends on national or regional tools such as humanitarian admission, temporary stay, visas, migration pathways, evacuation, planned relocation, or protection against return.
FinancingFinancing depends on national budgets, international cooperation, climate and disaster risk finance, development assistance, and humanitarian support.
Data systemsDisaster displacement data, climate risk assessments, migration data, border records, early warning systems, and humanitarian assessments shape policy use.
Delivery systemDelivery may occur through immigration authorities, disaster agencies, consular systems, humanitarian actors, planned relocation programmes, and local services.
PortabilityPortability is fragile because protection often depends on discretionary status, temporary stay, documentation, and national admission rules.
AccountabilityAccountability is mainly policy-based and cooperative rather than treaty-based, unless domestic or regional law creates specific rights.
Time horizonPreparedness, displacement response, temporary stay, planned relocation, and longer-term adaptation.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

No sources listed yet.

Related Mapping entries

Related research