Mapping Entry

Philippines Marawi Rehabilitation Architecture

The Marawi recovery architecture shows how conflict displacement can shift from emergency response to reconstruction while many households remain caught between return, compensation, housing, and local recovery systems.

Political economy archetype Reconstruction-led inclusion

Inclusion is pursued through reconstruction, compensation, housing, and local recovery, but land, documentation, and accountability bottlenecks shape outcomes.

What it is

The Marawi rehabilitation architecture refers to the inter-agency recovery, reconstruction, and rehabilitation arrangements established after the 2017 Marawi siege, including Task Force Bangon Marawi and subsequent national and Bangsamoro-level recovery initiatives.

Governance function

The architecture coordinates reconstruction, housing, services, compensation, infrastructure, and assistance for displaced and affected populations. Its governance challenge is to convert a conflict-recovery programme into durable urban inclusion.

Who is included

Families displaced from Marawi, residents of most affected areas, home-based IDPs, households in temporary shelters, and affected communities may be included through assistance, housing, livelihood, and reconstruction programmes.

Who is left out

Households without complete land or property documentation, renters, informal occupants, people outside official lists, and families whose displacement becomes protracted may face exclusion or delay.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks between emergency aid, temporary shelter, compensation, land and property claims, permanent housing, livelihood recovery, and municipal service restoration.

Why it matters

Marawi is a critical Southeast Asian case of conflict-related urban displacement. It shows that durable solutions depend not only on ending hostilities but on land, housing, compensation, infrastructure, local governance, and trust. The political economy archetype is reconstruction-led inclusion with land and accountability bottlenecks.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeReconstruction-led inclusion
ResponsibilityNational agencies, Task Force Bangon Marawi, local government, BARMM institutions, housing agencies, social welfare bodies, public works agencies, and donors have all held roles.
EligibilityEligibility depends on residence, displacement status, property claims, location in affected areas, household registration, and programme-specific criteria.
FinancingFinancing comes from national appropriations, rehabilitation pledges, donor support, housing and infrastructure budgets, and Bangsamoro or local recovery allocations.
Data systemsIDP lists, household profiling, property records, damage assessments, shelter records, compensation lists, and local government data shape inclusion.
Delivery systemDelivery runs through inter-agency task force structures, local authorities, housing programmes, cash or livelihood assistance, infrastructure projects, and social services.
PortabilityPortability is limited when assistance is tied to place of origin, property status, temporary shelter location, or official household lists.
AccountabilityAccountability depends on inter-agency oversight, legislative scrutiny, local grievance channels, audit, beneficiary communication, and access to land and compensation processes.
Time horizonPost-conflict recovery and reconstruction, with protracted displacement and return issues extending years beyond the emergency phase.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

Related Mapping entries

Related research