Mapping Entry

Indonesia Presidential Regulation No. 125/2016 on the Handling of Refugees from Abroad

Indonesia's refugee regulation creates an administrative framework for handling refugees from abroad, but it does not establish a full asylum system, durable status, or ordinary service inclusion.

Political economy archetype Humanitarian containment

Refugees are administratively received, sheltered, and coordinated without being absorbed into a full asylum, work, or national inclusion system.

What it is

Presidential Regulation No. 125/2016 on the Handling of Refugees from Abroad provides Indonesia's principal administrative framework for dealing with foreign refugees. It addresses rescue, discovery, shelter, coordination, security, and cooperation with international organizations.

Governance function

The regulation organizes refugee handling as an administrative and coordination matter rather than a full status-determination or integration system. It clarifies roles for national and local authorities while leaving refugee protection heavily dependent on cooperation with UNHCR and IOM.

Who is included

Foreign refugees and asylum seekers found or rescued in Indonesia may be included in reception, shelter, coordination, and referral arrangements.

Who is left out

People outside official handling channels, undocumented migrants not recognized as asylum seekers, long-staying refugees needing work or education access, and people seeking durable local integration remain weakly covered.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks between reception and long-term legal status, between shelter and ordinary housing, between humanitarian assistance and public services, and between temporary presence and durable solutions.

Why it matters

The regulation is one of Southeast Asia's clearest examples of administrative refugee governance without accession to the 1951 Refugee Convention. The political economy archetype is humanitarian containment through administrative coordination: refugees are managed and assisted, but not absorbed into national membership or welfare systems.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeHumanitarian containment
ResponsibilityThe regulation assigns roles to central government, local government, immigration, police, rescue authorities, and relevant ministries, with UNHCR and international organizations playing major operational roles.
EligibilityEligibility depends on being identified as a refugee or asylum seeker from abroad and falling within the administrative handling mechanisms established by the regulation.
FinancingFinancing depends on national and local administrative resources, international organizations, humanitarian funding, and partner support. The regulation does not create a comprehensive public financing entitlement.
Data systemsRefugee identification, immigration records, UNHCR registration, shelter records, and coordination data shape implementation.
Delivery systemDelivery runs through reception, shelters, local authorities, immigration offices, rescue agencies, UNHCR, IOM, and humanitarian partners.
PortabilityPortability is limited because refugees do not receive durable national status and may depend on location-specific shelter or assistance arrangements.
AccountabilityAccountability is administrative and coordination-based, with limited direct rights-based enforcement for refugees under domestic law.
Time horizonAdministrative framework for ongoing refugee reception and management, often applied in protracted situations.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

Related Mapping entries

Related research