Mapping Entry

IASC Framework on Durable Solutions for Internally Displaced Persons

The IASC Durable Solutions Framework defines when displacement-related needs have ended, but implementation depends on whether governments and partners connect solutions to land, services, livelihoods, safety, and participation.

Political economy archetype Solutions criteria without implementation authority

The framework defines what durable solutions require but relies on governments and partners to finance and implement them.

What it is

The IASC Framework on Durable Solutions for Internally Displaced Persons provides criteria and guidance for determining when IDPs have achieved a durable solution through sustainable return, local integration, or settlement elsewhere.

Governance function

The framework operationalizes durable solutions by identifying conditions such as safety, adequate standard of living, livelihoods, housing, documentation, family reunification, participation, and access to remedies.

Who is included

IDPs pursuing return, local integration, or settlement elsewhere, including those in protracted displacement and post-conflict or post-disaster settings.

Who is left out

People may remain outside if governments define solutions narrowly as return, if IDPs are not consulted, if informal settlers lack tenure, or if people are no longer counted after leaving camps.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks when IDPs leave emergency assistance but do not regain housing, land, livelihoods, documentation, security, education, health access, or participation in local governance.

Why it matters

The framework is central to the displacement continuum because it defines solutions as more than physical movement. The political economy archetype is solutions criteria without automatic implementation authority.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeSolutions criteria without implementation authority
ResponsibilityNational authorities carry primary responsibility, supported by humanitarian, development, peacebuilding, human rights, and local government actors.
EligibilityEligibility depends on internal displacement status and the pursuit of one of the three durable solutions, but durable outcomes are assessed through conditions rather than a single status label.
FinancingFinancing depends on national recovery budgets, local development finance, humanitarian-development cooperation, donor support, and sectoral programmes.
Data systemsIDP profiling, intentions surveys, return monitoring, housing and land records, service access data, livelihood assessments, and local governance data are central.
Delivery systemDelivery occurs through government recovery programmes, local authorities, humanitarian and development partners, housing/land systems, livelihood programmes, and service providers.
PortabilityPortability is essential: documentation, entitlements, assistance records, school records, health access, and land claims must follow IDPs across return, integration, or settlement locations.
AccountabilityAccountability depends on national law, local governance, participation mechanisms, grievance systems, protection monitoring, and inter-agency coordination.
Time horizonMedium- to long-term solutions process, often extending well beyond emergency response.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

Related Mapping entries

Related research