Mapping Entry

Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

The Global Compact for Migration promotes rights-based and cooperative migration governance, but it separates migrants from refugees and leaves access to services, status, and protection largely dependent on domestic systems.

Political economy archetype Managed mobility with rights language

The compact promotes rights-based migration cooperation while preserving state control over admission, status, and national implementation.

What it is

The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is a non-binding intergovernmental agreement adopted in 2018. It provides a cooperative framework for migration governance across objectives including data, regular pathways, decent work, services, identity, border governance, return, reintegration, and international cooperation.

Governance function

The compact organises migration as a whole-of-government and whole-of-society governance issue. It creates a policy vocabulary for cooperation while preserving state sovereignty over admission, status, and national implementation.

Who is included

Migrants in international migration contexts, including migrant workers, people in vulnerable situations, families, and communities affected by migration.

Who is left out

Refugees remain governed by separate refugee protection frameworks. IDPs and people displaced internally by conflict, disasters, development projects, or climate stress are not the compact's primary population unless migration pathways or cross-border mobility are implicated.

Where continuity breaks

Continuity breaks when migrants move between regular and irregular status, when service access depends on documentation, when labour protections do not follow across borders, or when return and reintegration are not connected to social protection and local development systems.

Why it matters

The compact is important for displacement governance because many displaced people are administratively treated as migrants when they move outside refugee or IDP categories. The political economy archetype is managed mobility with rights language: cooperation expands, but domestic status control remains central.

Governance coding table

Political economy archetypeManaged mobility with rights language
ResponsibilityStates carry primary implementation responsibility. UN Network on Migration, IOM, OHCHR, ILO, UNHCR where relevant, civil society, employers, local governments, and diaspora actors support implementation.
EligibilityEligibility depends on migrant status, national law, documentation, sectoral rules, and programme criteria rather than a single global entitlement.
FinancingThe compact does not create a direct financing entitlement. Implementation depends on national budgets, development cooperation, diaspora and remittance systems, labour market institutions, and international partnerships.
Data systemsThe compact emphasizes better migration data, identity documentation, evidence-based policymaking, and international data cooperation. It does not create a single registry.
Delivery systemDelivery occurs through national migration systems, consular services, labour institutions, local governments, education and health systems, border authorities, and service providers.
PortabilityPortability depends on recognition of identity documents, qualifications, social security arrangements, remittance channels, labour agreements, and return/reintegration systems.
AccountabilityAccountability is voluntary and review-based, including national implementation, regional review, the International Migration Review Forum, and stakeholder reporting.
Time horizonLong-term cooperative framework for international migration governance and implementation of the 23 objectives.

Sources

Official sources

Secondary sources

No sources listed yet.

Related Mapping entries

Related research